Alpha-Bio Tec NeO vs Spiral (SPI)
Quick answer
NeO is Alpha-Bio current flagship and the only implant in the range offered on all three of the company connections, so the name alone does not tell a laboratory what will fit it. Spiral — listed in older records as SPI — is a self-drilling bone-condensing implant on the internal hex platform only.
Side by side
Rows appear only where at least one side has data. Where a value is not verified we say so rather than leaving it blank.
Manufacturer
Body geometry
Alpha-Bio Tec NeO
Alpha-Bio Tec Spiral (SPI)
Material
Alpha-Bio Tec NeO
Alpha-Bio Tec Spiral (SPI)
Surface
Alpha-Bio Tec NeO
Alpha-Bio Tec Spiral (SPI)
Connection
Alpha-Bio Tec NeO
Alpha-Bio Tec Spiral (SPI)
Platform switching
Alpha-Bio Tec NeO
Alpha-Bio Tec Spiral (SPI)
The biggest differences
Design
Material and surface
Prosthetic ecosystem
Important limitations
So which is better?
Neither is universally better, and any page telling you otherwise is selling something. These are different designs with different trade-offs, and the right choice depends on the bone available, the position in the mouth, the planned restoration, and what the treating clinician is equipped and experienced to place and to service years from now. That last point is easy to overlook and matters more than most specification differences: components need to remain obtainable for as long as the implant is in place.
Regulatory record
US FDA 510(k) clearances held by each side, retrieved from the FDA's own database. Clearances are held at brand level, so every system from the same brand shares this record.
Alpha-Bio Tec NeO
via Alpha-Bio Tec
1
FDA 510(k) clearance
2007 – 2007
Filed by Alpha-Bio Tec , Ltd.
Alpha-Bio Tec Spiral (SPI)
via Alpha-Bio Tec
1
FDA 510(k) clearance
2007 – 2007
Filed by Alpha-Bio Tec , Ltd.
A clearance count is not a quality ranking, and the larger number is not the better implant. A brand with more clearances usually has a longer history or a broader component range. FDA "clearance" also is not FDA "approval" — it means the device was accepted as substantially equivalent to one already on the market, generally without a clinical trial. A blank here means we could not match a filing with confidence, not that the brand lacks authorisation. What these actually mean →
Sources
Numbers match the citations beside each claim above.
Primary sources
- [1]Alpha-Bio Tec Product Catalog 2019 — Alpha-Bio Tec. Ltd., 2019. Accessed 2026-07-21.
- [2]Part of Envista Group — Alpha-Bio Tec. — Alpha-Bio Tec. Ltd.. Accessed 2026-07-21.