Straumann BLX vs Astra Tech Implant System EV
Quick answer
BLX is a single fully tapered implant offered across a wide diameter range on one internal geometry; Astra Tech EV is a family of three differently shaped bodies — straight, conical and Profile — sharing one prosthetic interface. The two therefore answer the same planning question in opposite ways: BLX varies the size, Astra Tech EV varies the shape.
Side by side
Rows appear only where at least one side has data. Where a value is not verified we say so rather than leaving it blank.
Current status
Straumann BLX
Implant level
Straumann BLX
Astra Tech Implant System EV
Body geometry
Straumann BLX
Material
Astra Tech Implant System EV
Surface
Straumann BLX
Astra Tech Implant System EV
Connection
Straumann BLX
Astra Tech Implant System EV
Platform switching
Straumann BLX
Astra Tech Implant System EV
Available diameters
Straumann BLX
Astra Tech Implant System EV
Available lengths
Straumann BLX
Astra Tech Implant System EV
Short implant option
Straumann BLX
Astra Tech Implant System EV
Narrow implant option
Straumann BLX
Astra Tech Implant System EV
Geographic availability
Straumann BLX
Astra Tech Implant System EV
The biggest differences
Design
Material and surface
Prosthetic ecosystem
Geographic availability and serviceability
What may influence clinical selection
So which is better?
Neither is universally better, and any page telling you otherwise is selling something. These are different designs with different trade-offs, and the right choice depends on the bone available, the position in the mouth, the planned restoration, and what the treating clinician is equipped and experienced to place and to service years from now. That last point is easy to overlook and matters more than most specification differences: components need to remain obtainable for as long as the implant is in place.
Regulatory record
US FDA 510(k) clearances held by each side, retrieved from the FDA's own database. Clearances are held at brand level, so every system from the same brand shares this record.
Straumann BLX
via Straumann
30
FDA 510(k) clearances
2004 – 2026
Filed by Institut Straumann AG
Astra Tech Implant System EV
via Astra Tech Implant System
13
FDA 510(k) clearances
1994 – 2011
Filed by Astra Tech AB
A clearance count is not a quality ranking, and the larger number is not the better implant. A brand with more clearances usually has a longer history or a broader component range. FDA "clearance" also is not FDA "approval" — it means the device was accepted as substantially equivalent to one already on the market, generally without a clinical trial. A blank here means we could not match a filing with confidence, not that the brand lacks authorisation. What these actually mean →
Sources
Numbers match the citations beside each claim above.
Primary sources
- [1]Straumann BLX Implant System — Basic and Technical Information (702115/en) — Institut Straumann AG. Accessed 2026-07-21.
- [2]Straumann® Roxolid® — dental implant materials — Institut Straumann AG. Accessed 2026-07-21.
- [3]Surgical manual — Astra Tech Implant System® EV (32671181-USX-1804) — Dentsply Sirona. Accessed 2026-07-21.
- [4]Astra Tech Implant System® EV — Guided surgery manual (32671186-US-1706) — Dentsply Sirona. Accessed 2026-07-21.
- [5]Instructions for Use — Astra Tech Implant System® EV, OsseoSpeed™ EV (IFU 5694-EN Rev. 003) — Dentsply Sirona, 2022. Accessed 2026-07-22.
- [6]Instructions for Use — Astra Tech Implant System® EV, Astra Tech Implant EV Profile (IFU 5699-EN Rev. 002) — Dentsply Sirona, 2022. Accessed 2026-07-22.